Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
530.3 kcal
Score
8 / 100
Manju has a higher nutrition quality score (10) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
272 vs 530.3(+95.0%)
Score Diff
10 vs 8(-20.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Manju
Higher energy
Sohan
Score leader
Manju
Nutrient split
4 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Manju and Sohan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Manju has 272.0 kcal and Sohan has 530.3 kcal. The difference is 258.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 10 and 8. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Manju | Sohan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 115 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.16 mg | +100.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.11 mg | +175.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.16 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.4 mg | 2.1 mg | +50.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 2.8 g | -22.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.4 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 82 mg | 132 mg | +61.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 68 mg | +142.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.5 g | 59.8 g | -1.2% |
| Kolesterol | — | 42 mg | — |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 1.3 g | +62.5% |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 54 mg | +107.7% |
| Mangan | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.85 mg | 1.35 mg | +58.8% |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 215 mg | +16.2% |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 6.4 g | +10.3% |
| Sodyum | 65 mg | 58 mg | -10.8% |
| Su | 29.1 g | 4.2 g | -85.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.18 g | 13.2 g | +7233.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 22 µg | 26 µg | +18.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 10.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.8 g | 29.5 g | +3587.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.6 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 37.2 g | 44.5 g | +19.6% |
| Çinko | 0.75 mg | 1.25 mg | +66.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Manju and Sohan.
Manju has less energy per 100 g (272 kcal versus 530.3 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Manju has 0.18 g and Sohan has 13.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Manju 10, Sohan 8.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Manju · Sohan · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.