Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Papaya, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
60 vs 43(-28.3%)
Score Diff
33 vs 46(+39.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Papaya, Çiğ
Higher energy
Mango
Score leader
Papaya, Çiğ
Nutrient split
14 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mango and Papaya, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mango has 60.0 kcal and Papaya, Çiğ has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mango | Papaya, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 54 µg | 47 µg | -13.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.028 mg | 0.02 mg | -28.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.03 mg | -21.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.119 mg | 0.04 mg | -66.4% |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 37 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 274 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 589 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 36.4 mg | 60.9 mg | +67.3% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.16 mg | 0.25 mg | +56.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 1.7 g | +6.2% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.9 mg | 0.3 mg | -66.7% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 43 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 43 µg | 37 µg | -14.0% |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 14 mg | 10 mg | -28.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.2 µg | 2.6 µg | -38.1% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 20 mg | +81.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.98 g | 10.82 g | -27.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 1828 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 89 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 21 mg | +110.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.04 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.03 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.669 mg | 0.36 mg | -46.2% |
| Potasyum | 168 mg | 182 mg | +8.3% |
| Protein | 0.82 g | 0.47 g | -42.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.01 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.05 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.6 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.06 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 8 mg | +700.0% |
| Su | 83.46 g | 88.06 g | +5.5% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 37 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 6.1 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.07 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.38 g | 0.26 g | -31.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 13.66 g | 7.82 g | -42.8% |
| Çinko | 0.09 mg | 0.08 mg | -11.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mango and Papaya, Çiğ.
Papaya, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 60 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Mango has 1 mg and Papaya, Çiğ has 8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mango 33, Papaya, Çiğ 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.