Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Maitake Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
31 vs 228(+635.5%)
Score Diff
78 vs 66(-15.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Maitake Mantarı
Higher energy
Baobab Meyvesi Tozu
Score leader
Maitake Mantarı
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Maitake Mantarı and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Maitake Mantarı has 31.0 kcal and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 228.0 kcal. The difference is 197.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 78 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Maitake Mantarı | Baobab Meyvesi Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.158 mg | 0.05 mg | -68.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.242 mg | 0.14 mg | -42.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.056 mg | 0.06 mg | +7.1% |
| Bakir | 0.252 mg | 0.45 mg | +78.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 280 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 28.1 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 1124 iu | — | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | 28.1 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.3 mg | 2.1 mg | +600.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.7 g | 44.5 g | +1548.1% |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 74 mg | 48 mg | -35.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 295 mg | +29400.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.97 g | 76.2 g | +993.3% |
| Kül | 0.53 g | 5.8 g | +994.3% |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 160 mg | +1500.0% |
| Mangan | 0.059 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 6.585 mg | 1.8 mg | -72.7% |
| Potasyum | 204 mg | 2250 mg | +1002.9% |
| Protein | 1.94 g | 2.3 g | +18.6% |
| Selenyum | 2.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 90.37 g | 11.2 g | -87.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.038 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.19 g | 0.3 g | +57.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.082 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.07 g | 25.6 g | +1136.7% |
| Çinko | 0.76 mg | 0.9 mg | +18.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Maitake Mantarı and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu.
Maitake Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (31 kcal versus 228 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Maitake Mantarı has 1 mg and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 295 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Maitake Mantarı 78, Baobab Meyvesi Tozu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.