Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
50 kcal
Score
35 / 100
Limon has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
29 vs 50(+72.4%)
Score Diff
52 vs 35(-32.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Limon
Higher energy
Kan Portakalı, Çiğ
Score leader
Limon
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Limon and Kan Portakalı, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Limon has 29.0 kcal and Kan Portakalı, Çiğ has 50.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 52 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Limon | Kan Portakalı, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | 11 µg | +1000.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.087 mg | +117.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.04 mg | +100.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.06 mg | -25.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 53 mg | 53.2 mg | +0.4% |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 0.1 mg | -83.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.4 g | -14.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 29 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 30 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 14 mg | -12.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 26 mg | 40 mg | +53.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.32 g | 12 g | +28.8% |
| Kül | — | 0.45 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 8 mg | 10 mg | +25.0% |
| Niasin | 0.1 mg | 0.4 mg | +300.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.19 mg | 0.25 mg | +31.6% |
| Potasyum | 138 mg | 181 mg | +31.2% |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1 g | -9.1% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | — | — |
| Su | 88.98 g | 87.2 g | -2.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 11 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 8.4 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.12 g | -60.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.5 g | 9.35 g | +274.0% |
| Çinko | 0.06 mg | 0.07 mg | +16.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Limon and Kan Portakalı, Çiğ.
Limon has less energy per 100 g (29 kcal versus 50 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Limon has 1 µg and Kan Portakalı, Çiğ has 11 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Limon 52, Kan Portakalı, Çiğ 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.