Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
15 kcal
Score
85 / 100
Labada (Efelek) has a higher nutrition quality score (92) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
22 vs 15(-31.8%)
Score Diff
92 vs 85(-7.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Labada (Efelek)
Higher energy
Labada (Efelek)
Score leader
Labada (Efelek)
Nutrient split
16 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Labada (Efelek) and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Labada (Efelek) has 22.0 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 92 and 85. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Labada (Efelek) | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 200 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.027 mg | -32.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.033 mg | -58.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.13 mg | 0.041 mg | -68.5% |
| Beta Karoten | 2400 µg | 45 µg | -98.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 48 mg | 2.8 mg | -94.2% |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 0.28 mg | -88.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.9 g | 0.5 g | -82.8% |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 28 mg | 24 mg | -14.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 44 mg | 16 mg | -63.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.2 g | 3.63 g | +13.4% |
| Magnezyum | 41 mg | 13 mg | -68.3% |
| Mangan | 0.35 mg | 0.079 mg | -77.4% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.098 mg | -75.5% |
| Oksalik asit | 450 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 338 mg | 147 mg | -56.5% |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.65 g | -67.5% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 2 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 92.1 g | 95.23 g | +3.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 13 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.7 g | 0.11 g | -84.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.2 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Labada (Efelek) and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 22 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Labada (Efelek) has 2400 µg and Acur has 45 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Labada (Efelek) 92, Acur 85.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.