Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
164 kcal
Score
84 / 100
Ahtapot (Izgara) has a higher nutrition quality score (84) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
165.8 vs 164(-1.1%)
Score Diff
51 vs 84(+64.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Higher energy
Kuzu Kelle Paça
Score leader
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuzu Kelle Paça and Ahtapot (Izgara) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuzu Kelle Paça has 165.8 kcal and Ahtapot (Izgara) has 164.0 kcal. The difference is 1.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 51 and 84. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuzu Kelle Paça | Ahtapot (Izgara) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 90 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 36 µg | +1400.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.65 mg | +441.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.74 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.3 mg | 9.54 mg | +314.8% |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 160 mg | 279 mg | +74.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 106 mg | +341.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.2 g | 4.4 g | +2100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 105 mg | 96 mg | -8.6% |
| Kül | 0.8 g | 3.2 g | +300.0% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 60 mg | +275.0% |
| Niasin | 3.5 mg | 3.78 mg | +8.0% |
| Potasyum | 180 mg | 630 mg | +250.0% |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 29.82 g | +80.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 89.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 350 mg | 460 mg | +31.4% |
| Su | 71.5 g | 60.5 g | -15.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.8 g | 0.45 g | -90.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 0.32 g | -92.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 11 g | 2.08 g | -81.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | 0.51 g | -36.3% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 3.36 mg | +8.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuzu Kelle Paça and Ahtapot (Izgara).
Ahtapot (Izgara) has less energy per 100 g (164 kcal versus 165.8 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Kuzu Kelle Paça has 0.2 g and Ahtapot (Izgara) has 4.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuzu Kelle Paça 51, Ahtapot (Izgara) 84.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.