Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Kuru Mercanköşk has a higher nutrition quality score (88) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
271 vs 282(+4.1%)
Score Diff
88 vs 77(-12.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru Mercanköşk
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Kuru Mercanköşk
Nutrient split
8 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru Mercanköşk and Aleppo biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru Mercanköşk has 271.0 kcal and Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 88 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru Mercanköşk | Aleppo biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 403 µg | 1480 µg | +267.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.29 mg | 0.3 mg | +3.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.9 mg | +181.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.19 mg | 2.1 mg | +76.5% |
| Bakir | 1.13 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 4806 µg | 17000 µg | +253.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 51.4 mg | 75 mg | +45.9% |
| Demir | 82.71 mg | 14.5 mg | -82.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 40.3 g | 27.2 g | -32.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.69 mg | 28 mg | +1556.8% |
| Fosfor | 306 mg | 290 mg | -5.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 621.7 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1990 mg | 148 mg | -92.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.56 g | 52 g | -14.1% |
| Kül | 12.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 346 mg | 152 mg | -56.1% |
| Mangan | 5.43 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 4.12 mg | 8.7 mg | +111.2% |
| Potasyum | 1522 mg | 1950 mg | +28.1% |
| Protein | 12.66 g | 12 g | -5.2% |
| Selenyum | 4.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 77 mg | 1600 mg | +1977.9% |
| Su | 7.64 g | 10.5 g | +37.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.53 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 274 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.04 g | 10 g | +42.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.41 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.09 g | 10.3 g | +151.8% |
| Çinko | 3.6 mg | 2.4 mg | -33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru Mercanköşk and Aleppo biberi.
Kuru Mercanköşk has less energy per 100 g (271 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Kuru Mercanköşk has 77 mg and Aleppo biberi has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru Mercanköşk 88, Aleppo biberi 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.