Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Kuru Erik has a higher nutrition quality score (14) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
240 vs 282(+17.5%)
Score Diff
14 vs 12(-14.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru Erik
Higher energy
Hurma
Score leader
Kuru Erik
Nutrient split
12 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru Erik and Hurma are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru Erik has 240.0 kcal and Hurma has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 42.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru Erik | Hurma | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.051 mg | 0.05 mg | -2.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.186 mg | 0.07 mg | -62.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.205 mg | 0.17 mg | -17.1% |
| Bakir | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 19 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 6 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.6 mg | 0.4 mg | -33.3% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.93 mg | 1.02 mg | +9.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 7.1 g | 8 g | +12.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 1004 kj | 282 kj | -71.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 240 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 4 µg | 19 µg | +375.0% |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 69 mg | 62 mg | -10.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 59.5 µg | 2.7 µg | -95.5% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 43 mg | 39 mg | -9.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 75.03 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 63.88 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 75 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 41 mg | 43 mg | +4.9% |
| Mangan | 0.187 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.04 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.88 mg | 1.27 mg | -32.4% |
| Potasyum | 732 mg | 656 mg | -10.4% |
| Protein | 2.18 g | 2.45 g | +12.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0.3 µg | 3 µg | +900.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 30.9 g | 20.53 g | -33.6% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.03 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 19 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 6.3 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.38 g | 0.39 g | +2.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 38.13 g | 63.35 g | +66.1% |
| Çinko | 0.26 mg | 0.29 mg | +11.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru Erik and Hurma.
Kuru Erik has less energy per 100 g (240 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Kuru Erik has 0.3 µg and Hurma has 3 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru Erik 14, Hurma 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.