Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Kuru dereotu has a higher nutrition quality score (96) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
253 vs 282(+11.5%)
Score Diff
96 vs 71(-26.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru dereotu
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Kuru dereotu
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kuru dereotu and Acı paprika are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kuru dereotu has 253.0 kcal and Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 96 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kuru dereotu | Acı paprika | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 293 µg | 2463 µg | +740.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.42 mg | 0.33 mg | -21.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.28 mg | 1.23 mg | +339.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.63 mg | 2.09 mg | +231.7% |
| Bakir | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 26162 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 50 mg | 0.9 mg | -98.2% |
| Demir | 48.78 mg | 21.14 mg | -56.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 13.6 g | 34.8 g | +155.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 29.1 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 274 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 543 mg | 314 mg | -42.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 80.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1784 mg | 177 mg | -90.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 55.82 g | 53.99 g | -3.3% |
| Kül | 12.55 g | 7.8 g | -37.8% |
| Magnezyum | 256 mg | 178 mg | -30.5% |
| Mangan | 1.26 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.81 mg | 10.06 mg | +258.0% |
| Potasyum | 3308 mg | 2280 mg | -31.1% |
| Protein | 19.96 g | 14.14 g | -29.2% |
| Sodyum | 208 mg | 30 mg | -85.6% |
| Su | 7.3 g | 8.05 g | +10.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.24 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.87 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 4.36 g | 12.89 g | +195.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.3 mg | 4.33 mg | +31.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kuru dereotu and Acı paprika.
Kuru dereotu has less energy per 100 g (253 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Kuru dereotu has 293 µg and Acı paprika has 2463 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kuru dereotu 96, Acı paprika 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.