Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
292 kcal
Score
32 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
717 vs 292(-59.3%)
Score Diff
— vs 32
Higher energy
Köy Tereyağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
6 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Köy Tereyağı and Antep peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Köy Tereyağı has 717.0 kcal and Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal. The difference is 425.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Köy Tereyağı | Antep peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 2499 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 684 µg | 195 µg | -71.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.034 mg | 0.36 mg | +958.8% |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 60 iu | — | — |
| Demir | — | 0.42 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.32 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 1221 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 450 mg | +1775.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 680 mg | +2733.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.06 g | 1.8 g | +2900.0% |
| Kolesterol | 215 mg | 72 mg | -66.5% |
| Kül | 0.09 g | 6.7 g | +7344.4% |
| Laktoz | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 25 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 19.9 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 24 mg | 115 mg | +379.2% |
| Protein | 0.85 g | 21.5 g | +2429.4% |
| Retinol | — | 190 µg | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 21.5 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 1250 mg | +11263.6% |
| Su | 17.94 g | 48 g | +167.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 51.37 g | 13.8 g | -73.1% |
| Toplam Kolin | 18.8 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 21.02 g | 5.8 g | -72.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 81.11 g | 22 g | -72.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.04 g | 0.85 g | -72.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 3.2 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Köy Tereyağı and Antep peyniri.
Antep peyniri has less energy per 100 g (292 kcal versus 717 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Köy Tereyağı has 11 mg and Antep peyniri has 1250 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Köy Tereyağı —, Antep peyniri 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.