Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
178 kcal
Score
16 / 100
Chitranna has a higher nutrition quality score (16) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
234 vs 178(-23.9%)
Score Diff
15 vs 16(+6.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Chitranna
Higher energy
Korokke
Score leader
Chitranna
Nutrient split
18 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Korokke and Chitranna are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Korokke has 234.0 kcal and Chitranna has 178.0 kcal. The difference is 56.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 15 and 16. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Korokke | Chitranna | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.03 mg | -50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.11 mg | -50.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 11.2 mg | 6.8 mg | -39.3% |
| Demir | 0.95 mg | 0.82 mg | -13.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 1.4 g | -33.3% |
| Folat DFE | 23 µg | 28 µg | +21.7% |
| Fosfor | 72 mg | 62 mg | -13.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 24.3 g | 28.5 g | +17.3% |
| Kolesterol | 13 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.4 g | 1.1 g | -21.4% |
| Magnezyum | 18.5 mg | 25 mg | +35.1% |
| Niasin | 1.48 mg | 1.15 mg | -22.3% |
| Potasyum | 275 mg | 115 mg | -58.2% |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 3.2 g | -40.7% |
| Sodyum | 340 mg | 285 mg | -16.2% |
| Su | 54.2 g | 60.5 g | +11.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 0.92 g | -70.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.3 g | 2.75 g | -48.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.8 g | 5.8 g | -54.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.6 g | 1.68 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.5 g | 0.6 g | -60.0% |
| Çinko | 0.74 mg | 0.68 mg | -8.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Korokke and Chitranna.
Chitranna has less energy per 100 g (178 kcal versus 234 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Korokke has 3.1 g and Chitranna has 0.92 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Korokke 15, Chitranna 16.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.