Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
68.5 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Kombucha (Sade Fermente) has a higher nutrition quality score (37) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
14.5 vs 68.5(+372.4%)
Score Diff
37 vs 29(-21.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kombucha (Sade Fermente)
Higher energy
Adeni
Score leader
Kombucha (Sade Fermente)
Nutrient split
1 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kombucha (Sade Fermente) and Adeni are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kombucha (Sade Fermente) has 14.5 kcal and Adeni has 68.5 kcal. The difference is 54.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 37 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kombucha (Sade Fermente) | Adeni | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.015 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.06 µg | 0.28 µg | +366.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.022 mg | 0.11 mg | +400.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.018 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.04 mg | 0.15 mg | +275.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 68.5 kcal | — |
| Etil alkol | 0.25 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 4 mg | 65 mg | +1525.0% |
| Kafein | 5 mg | 18 mg | +260.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 75 mg | +1150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.6 g | 10.2 g | +183.3% |
| Kolesterol | — | 7 mg | — |
| Kül | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 2.5 mg | 12 mg | +380.0% |
| Niasin | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 22 mg | 110 mg | +400.0% |
| Protein | 0.05 g | 2.1 g | +4100.0% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 35 mg | +483.3% |
| Su | 96.1 g | 82.5 g | -14.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.35 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 2.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.4 g | 9.8 g | +188.2% |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.25 mg | +733.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kombucha (Sade Fermente) and Adeni.
Kombucha (Sade Fermente) has less energy per 100 g (14.5 kcal versus 68.5 kcal).
For measured Protein, Kombucha (Sade Fermente) has 0.05 g and Adeni has 2.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kombucha (Sade Fermente) 37, Adeni 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.