Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kola cevizi has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
220.8 vs 572(+159.1%)
Score Diff
31 vs 17(-45.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kola cevizi
Higher energy
Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak)
Score leader
Kola cevizi
Nutrient split
5 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kola cevizi and Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kola cevizi has 220.8 kcal and Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 572.0 kcal. The difference is 351.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kola cevizi | Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.87 mg | +443.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.19 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 1.7 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 1.3 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9.8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.75 mg | 3.9 mg | +41.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.3 g | 10.3 g | -16.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.8 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 178 mg | 490 mg | +175.3% |
| Kafein | 2150 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115 mg | 105 mg | -8.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 45 g | 23.4 g | -48.0% |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 3 g | +7.1% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 2900 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 92 mg | 121 mg | +31.5% |
| Niasin | 1.85 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 348 mg | 1025 mg | +194.5% |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 20.6 g | +174.7% |
| Sodyum | 14 mg | 1 mg | -92.9% |
| Su | 42.5 g | 4.5 g | -89.4% |
| Teobromin | 130 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 5.8 g | +1188.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 51 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | 24.5 g | +7556.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 48.5 g | +3941.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 14.3 g | +5007.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 7.5 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.15 mg | 2.2 mg | +91.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kola cevizi and Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak).
Kola cevizi has less energy per 100 g (220.8 kcal versus 572 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Kola cevizi has 0.32 g and Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 24.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kola cevizi 31, Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.