Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
418 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Kola cevizi has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
220.8 vs 418(+89.3%)
Score Diff
31 vs 29(-6.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kola cevizi
Higher energy
Akçaağaç tohumu
Score leader
Kola cevizi
Nutrient split
6 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kola cevizi and Akçaağaç tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kola cevizi has 220.8 kcal and Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal. The difference is 197.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kola cevizi | Akçaağaç tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.35 mg | +118.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.19 mg | 0.18 mg | -5.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.42 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.85 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9.8 mg | 2.4 mg | -75.5% |
| Demir | 2.75 mg | 4.8 mg | +74.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.3 g | 11.5 g | -6.5% |
| Folat DFE | — | 62 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 178 mg | 390 mg | +119.1% |
| Kafein | 2150 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115 mg | 145 mg | +26.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 45 g | 38.6 g | -14.2% |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 3.7 g | +32.1% |
| Magnezyum | 92 mg | 180 mg | +95.7% |
| Mangan | — | 2.6 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.85 mg | 2.1 mg | +13.5% |
| Potasyum | 348 mg | 650 mg | +86.8% |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 22.4 g | +198.7% |
| Sodyum | 14 mg | 9 mg | -35.7% |
| Su | 42.5 g | 18.5 g | -56.5% |
| Teobromin | 130 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 2.1 g | +366.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | 6.5 g | +1931.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 16.8 g | +1300.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 7.2 g | +2471.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.15 mg | 3.2 mg | +178.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kola cevizi and Akçaağaç tohumu.
Kola cevizi has less energy per 100 g (220.8 kcal versus 418 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Kola cevizi has 0.28 g and Akçaağaç tohumu has 7.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kola cevizi 31, Akçaağaç tohumu 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.