Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Kokum şurubu has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
245 vs 263(+7.3%)
Score Diff
12 vs 6(-50.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kokum şurubu
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Kokum şurubu
Nutrient split
11 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kokum şurubu and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kokum şurubu has 245.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 18.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 12 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kokum şurubu | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 12.5 mg | 8 mg | -36.0% |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 0.4 mg | -63.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 1.1 g | +120.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 9 mg | -25.0% |
| Fruktoz | 28 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 26.5 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 15 mg | -37.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.5 g | 68 g | +12.4% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | 0.3 g | -66.7% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 6 mg | -62.5% |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 77 mg | -46.9% |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | 0.0% |
| Sitrik asit | 1200 mg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 25 mg | 12 mg | -52.0% |
| Su | 38 g | 30.2 g | -20.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.1 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 56 g | 60.3 g | +7.7% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.08 mg | -46.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kokum şurubu and Ahududu reçeli.
Kokum şurubu has less energy per 100 g (245 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Kokum şurubu has 0.5 g and Ahududu reçeli has 1.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kokum şurubu 12, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.