Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
158.4 kcal
Score
9 / 100
Kluai buat chi has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164.5 vs 158.4(-3.7%)
Score Diff
13 vs 9(-30.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kluai buat chi
Higher energy
Kluai buat chi
Score leader
Kluai buat chi
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kluai buat chi and Tabtim krob are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kluai buat chi has 164.5 kcal and Tabtim krob has 158.4 kcal. The difference is 6.1 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kluai buat chi | Tabtim krob | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.032 mg | 0.024 mg | -25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.015 mg | -60.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.042 mg | -76.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.8 mg | 1.2 mg | -75.0% |
| Demir | 0.45 mg | 0.48 mg | +6.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.74 g | 0.95 g | -45.4% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 164.5 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 28 mg | 26 mg | -7.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 14.5 mg | 14 mg | -3.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.85 g | 24.3 g | +16.5% |
| Kül | — | 1.15 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| Mangan | 0.38 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.32 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 248 mg | 142 mg | -42.7% |
| Protein | 1.15 g | 1.12 g | -2.6% |
| Sodyum | 45 mg | 22 mg | -51.1% |
| Su | 67.2 g | 65.4 g | -2.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.32 g | 5.92 g | -28.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 6 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 9.42 g | 6.85 g | -27.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 14.2 g | 18.2 g | +28.2% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.22 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kluai buat chi and Tabtim krob.
Tabtim krob has less energy per 100 g (158.4 kcal versus 164.5 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Kluai buat chi has 0.18 mg and Tabtim krob has 0.042 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kluai buat chi 13, Tabtim krob 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.