Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
462.9 kcal
Score
9 / 100
Kluai buat chi has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164.5 vs 462.9(+181.4%)
Score Diff
13 vs 9(-30.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kluai buat chi
Higher energy
Shebakia
Score leader
Kluai buat chi
Nutrient split
3 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kluai buat chi and Shebakia are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kluai buat chi has 164.5 kcal and Shebakia has 462.9 kcal. The difference is 298.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kluai buat chi | Shebakia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.032 mg | 0.18 mg | +462.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.12 mg | +215.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.45 mg | 2.4 mg | +433.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.74 g | 2.8 g | +60.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 164.5 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 28 mg | 125 mg | +346.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 14.5 mg | 110 mg | +658.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.85 g | 62.4 g | +199.3% |
| Kül | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 45 mg | +87.5% |
| Mangan | 0.38 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.5 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 248 mg | 180 mg | -27.4% |
| Protein | 1.15 g | 7.2 g | +526.1% |
| Sodyum | 45 mg | 140 mg | +211.1% |
| Su | 67.2 g | 5.1 g | -92.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.32 g | 4.2 g | -49.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 8.1 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 9.42 g | 20.5 g | +117.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 7.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 14.2 g | 32.5 g | +128.9% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 1.1 mg | +400.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kluai buat chi and Shebakia.
Kluai buat chi has less energy per 100 g (164.5 kcal versus 462.9 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Kluai buat chi has 14.5 mg and Shebakia has 110 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kluai buat chi 13, Shebakia 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.