Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
75 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Kivi has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
61 vs 75(+22.9%)
Score Diff
43 vs 33(-23.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kivi
Higher energy
Ambrosia
Score leader
Kivi
Nutrient split
14 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kivi and Ambrosia are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kivi has 61.0 kcal and Ambrosia has 75.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kivi | Ambrosia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 6 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 7 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.027 mg | 0.07 mg | +159.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.025 mg | 0.03 mg | +20.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.063 mg | 0.1 mg | +58.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 23 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 45 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 55 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 92.7 mg | 43.8 mg | -52.8% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.31 mg | 0.12 mg | -61.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3 g | 2 g | -33.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.46 mg | 0.12 mg | -91.8% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 75 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 61 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 23 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 34 mg | 15 mg | -55.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 40.3 µg | 0.2 µg | -99.5% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 34 mg | 24 mg | -29.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.66 g | 16.45 g | +12.2% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 66 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 17 mg | 15 mg | -11.8% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.05 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.341 mg | 0.35 mg | +2.6% |
| Potasyum | 312 mg | 201 mg | -35.6% |
| Protein | 1.14 g | 0.81 g | -28.9% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.03 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.5 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.04 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.36 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.14 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.1 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.04 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 1 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 83.07 g | 81.32 g | -2.1% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 25 µg | 23 µg | -8.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 7.8 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.52 g | 0.98 g | +88.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.05 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 8.99 g | 12.81 g | +42.5% |
| Çinko | 0.14 mg | 0.12 mg | -14.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kivi and Ambrosia.
Kivi has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 75 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Kivi has 0.027 mg and Ambrosia has 0.07 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kivi 43, Ambrosia 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Kivi · Ambrosia · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.