Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
120 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Kinoa (Pişmemiş) and Kinoa (Pişmiş) have the same nutrition score (32).
Energy Diff
368 vs 120(-67.4%)
Score Diff
32 vs 32(0.0%)
Higher energy
Kinoa (Pişmemiş)
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
15 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kinoa (Pişmemiş) and Kinoa (Pişmiş) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kinoa (Pişmemiş) has 368.0 kcal and Kinoa (Pişmiş) has 120.0 kcal. The difference is 248.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kinoa (Pişmemiş) | Kinoa (Pişmiş) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.107 mg | -70.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.119 mg | -62.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.112 mg | -77.1% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 1.49 mg | -67.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 2.8 g | -60.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.63 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 184 µg | 42 µg | -77.2% |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 152 mg | -66.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 17 mg | -63.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 21.28 g | -66.8% |
| Kül | 2.38 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 64 mg | -67.5% |
| Mangan | 2.03 mg | 0.611 mg | -69.9% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.61 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.412 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 172 mg | -69.4% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 4.4 g | -68.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.29 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.71 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 7 mg | +40.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 71.62 g | +439.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 1.92 g | -68.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.87 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 1.07 mg | -65.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kinoa (Pişmemiş) and Kinoa (Pişmiş).
Kinoa (Pişmiş) has less energy per 100 g (120 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Su, Kinoa (Pişmemiş) has 13.28 g and Kinoa (Pişmiş) has 71.62 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kinoa (Pişmemiş) 32, Kinoa (Pişmiş) 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.