Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
23 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
34 vs 23(-32.4%)
Score Diff
54 vs 60(+11.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ
Higher energy
Çiğ Kavun
Score leader
Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ
Nutrient split
25 - 16 (tie: 26)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çiğ Kavun and Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çiğ Kavun has 34.0 kcal and Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ has 23.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 54 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
67 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çiğ Kavun | Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 3382 iu | 509 iu | -84.9% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 169 µg | 25 µg | -85.2% |
| Alanin | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 16 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Arjinin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 0.14 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.02 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.06 mg | +200.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.09 mg | +125.0% |
| Besin folati | 21 µg | 14 µg | -33.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 2020 µg | 305 µg | -84.9% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Betain | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 36.7 mg | 1600 mg | +4259.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | — | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.21 mg | 0.5 mg | +138.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 0.3 g | -66.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.05 mg | 0.18 mg | +260.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 34 kj | 23 kj | -32.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Fitosteroller | 10 mg | — | — |
| Florür | 1 µg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | 14 µg | -33.3% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 15 mg | 9 mg | -40.0% |
| Fruktoz | 1.87 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 1.54 g | — | — |
| Glisin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 0.21 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.5 µg | 1.4 µg | -44.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 10 mg | +11.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.16 g | 4.8 g | -41.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 0.65 g | 0.2 g | -69.2% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lizin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 26 µg | 17 µg | -34.6% |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 12 mg | 0.0% |
| Maltoz | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Metiyonin | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0 g | 0.08 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.73 mg | 0.4 mg | -45.2% |
| Nisasta | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.1 mg | 0.2 mg | +100.0% |
| Potasyum | 267 mg | 97 mg | -63.7% |
| Prolin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Protein | 0.84 g | 0.4 g | -52.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.04 g | 0.05 g | +25.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.05 g | 0.04 g | -20.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Sakkaroz | 4.35 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.4 µg | 0.1 µg | -75.0% |
| Serin | 0.04 g | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.04 g | 0.05 g | +25.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sistin | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 3 mg | -81.3% |
| Su | 90.15 g | 94.3 g | +4.6% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Tirozin | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.05 g | 0.07 g | +40.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 21 µg | 14 µg | -33.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 7.6 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.19 g | 0.3 g | +57.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.08 g | 0.09 g | +12.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.86 g | 4.5 g | -42.7% |
| Treonin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.18 mg | 0.1 mg | -44.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çiğ Kavun and Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ.
Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (23 kcal versus 34 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Çiğ Kavun has 36.7 mg and Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çiğ Kavun 54, Acerola Meyve Suyu, Çiğ 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.