Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
308 kcal
Score
30 / 100
Kashkaval Peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
383 vs 308(-19.6%)
Score Diff
31 vs 30(-3.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kashkaval Peyniri
Higher energy
Kashkaval Peyniri
Score leader
Kashkaval Peyniri
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kashkaval Peyniri and Abaza Peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kashkaval Peyniri has 383.0 kcal and Abaza Peyniri has 308.0 kcal. The difference is 75.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 30. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kashkaval Peyniri | Abaza Peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 275 µg | 210 µg | -23.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.7 µg | 1.4 µg | -17.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.45 mg | 0.35 mg | -22.2% |
| D Vitamini | 0.6 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fosfor | 520 mg | 460 mg | -11.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 780 mg | 680 mg | -12.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.3 g | 1.2 g | -7.7% |
| Kolesterol | 95 mg | 75 mg | -21.1% |
| Kül | 4.1 g | 4.6 g | +12.2% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 24 mg | -14.3% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 120 mg | +4.3% |
| Protein | 25.8 g | 21.5 g | -16.7% |
| Retinol | 268 µg | — | — |
| Selenyum | 18.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 810 mg | 950 mg | +17.3% |
| Su | 37.8 g | 48.5 g | +28.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 19.5 g | 15.2 g | -22.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.5 g | 6.8 g | -20.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 31 g | 24.2 g | -21.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.2 g | 0.8 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.4 mg | 2.8 mg | -17.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kashkaval Peyniri and Abaza Peyniri.
Abaza Peyniri has less energy per 100 g (308 kcal versus 383 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Kashkaval Peyniri has 1.2 g and Abaza Peyniri has 0.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kashkaval Peyniri 31, Abaza Peyniri 30.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.