Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
15 kcal
Score
85 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
43 vs 15(-65.1%)
Score Diff
61 vs 85(+39.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Kara pancar
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kara pancar and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kara pancar has 43.0 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 28.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 85. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kara pancar | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.031 mg | 0.027 mg | -12.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.033 mg | -17.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.067 mg | 0.04 mg | -40.3% |
| Bakir | 0.075 mg | 0.041 mg | -45.3% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 45 µg | — |
| Betain | 128.7 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.9 mg | 2.8 mg | -42.9% |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.28 mg | -65.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 0.5 g | -82.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 40 mg | 24 mg | -40.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.2 µg | 16.4 µg | +8100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 16 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.56 g | 3.63 g | -62.0% |
| Kül | 1.08 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 13 mg | -43.5% |
| Mangan | 0.329 mg | 0.079 mg | -76.0% |
| Niasin | 0.334 mg | 0.098 mg | -70.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.155 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 325 mg | 147 mg | -54.8% |
| Protein | 1.61 g | 0.65 g | -59.6% |
| Sodyum | 78 mg | 2 mg | -97.4% |
| Su | 87.58 g | 95.23 g | +8.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 109 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.17 g | 0.11 g | -35.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.76 g | 1.67 g | -75.3% |
| Çinko | 0.35 mg | 0.2 mg | -42.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kara pancar and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Kara pancar has 0.2 µg and Acur has 16.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kara pancar 61, Acur 85.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.