Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Kara kakule has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
311 vs 282(-9.3%)
Score Diff
77 vs 71(-7.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara kakule
Higher energy
Kara kakule
Score leader
Kara kakule
Nutrient split
6 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kara kakule and Acı paprika are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kara kakule has 311.0 kcal and Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 77 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kara kakule | Acı paprika | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2463 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.2 mg | 0.33 mg | +65.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 1.23 mg | +583.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.23 mg | 2.09 mg | +808.7% |
| Bakir | 0.38 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 26162 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 0.9 mg | -95.7% |
| Demir | 14 mg | 21.14 mg | +51.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 28 g | 34.8 g | +24.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 29.1 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 178 mg | 314 mg | +76.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 80.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 383 mg | 177 mg | -53.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.5 g | 53.99 g | -21.2% |
| Kül | 5.8 g | 7.8 g | +34.5% |
| Magnezyum | 229 mg | 178 mg | -22.3% |
| Mangan | 28 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.1 mg | 10.06 mg | +814.5% |
| Potasyum | 1119 mg | 2280 mg | +103.8% |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 14.14 g | +30.9% |
| Sodyum | 18 mg | 30 mg | +66.7% |
| Su | 8.2 g | 8.05 g | -1.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 68 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.7 g | 12.89 g | +92.4% |
| Çinko | 7.5 mg | 4.33 mg | -42.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kara kakule and Acı paprika.
Acı paprika has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 311 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Kara kakule has 1.1 mg and Acı paprika has 10.06 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kara kakule 77, Acı paprika 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.