Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28.5 vs 228(+700.0%)
Score Diff
90 vs 66(-26.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Higher energy
Baobab Meyvesi Tozu
Score leader
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 28.5 kcal and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 228.0 kcal. The difference is 199.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 90 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kanlıca Çam Mantarı | Baobab Meyvesi Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.05 mg | -54.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.35 mg | 0.14 mg | -60.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | 0.06 mg | -57.1% |
| Bakir | 0.38 mg | 0.45 mg | +18.4% |
| Beta-glukan | 0.8 g | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | 280 mg | +8650.0% |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | 2.8 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 2.1 mg | +16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 44.5 g | +1754.2% |
| Ergosterol | 42 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 32 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 48 mg | -43.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 295 mg | +1866.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.2 g | 76.2 g | +1714.3% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | 5.8 g | +544.4% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 160 mg | +900.0% |
| Niasin | 4.1 mg | 1.8 mg | -56.1% |
| Potasyum | 390 mg | 2250 mg | +476.9% |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.3 g | 0.0% |
| Selenyum | 9.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 3 mg | -40.0% |
| Su | 91.8 g | 11.2 g | -87.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.6 g | 0.3 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 25.6 g | +2033.3% |
| Çinko | 0.85 mg | 0.9 mg | +5.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kanlıca Çam Mantarı and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (28.5 kcal versus 228 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 3.2 mg and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 280 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kanlıca Çam Mantarı 90, Baobab Meyvesi Tozu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.