Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28.5 vs 43(+50.9%)
Score Diff
90 vs 49(-45.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Higher energy
Aslan Yelesi Mantarı
Score leader
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Nutrient split
14 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 28.5 kcal and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 14.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 90 and 49. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kanlıca Çam Mantarı | Aslan Yelesi Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.14 mg | +27.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.35 mg | 0.36 mg | +2.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.38 mg | 0.19 mg | -50.0% |
| Beta-glukan | 0.8 g | 2.15 g | +168.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | 1.1 mg | -65.6% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.15 µg | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | 2.8 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 0.41 mg | -77.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 3.4 g | +41.7% |
| Ergosterol | 42 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 32 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 82 mg | -3.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.2 g | 7.58 g | +80.5% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | 0.84 g | -6.7% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 12 mg | -25.0% |
| Niasin | 4.1 mg | 1.62 mg | -60.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.45 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 390 mg | 304 mg | -22.1% |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.63 g | +14.3% |
| Selenyum | 9.5 µg | 1.4 µg | -85.3% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 4 mg | -20.0% |
| Su | 91.8 g | 88.6 g | -3.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.6 g | 0.35 g | -41.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 0.52 g | -56.7% |
| Çinko | 0.85 mg | 0.74 mg | -12.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kanlıca Çam Mantarı and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (28.5 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured Beta-glukan, Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 0.8 g and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 2.15 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kanlıca Çam Mantarı 90, Aslan Yelesi Mantarı 49.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.