Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
29 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Limon has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
50 vs 29(-42.0%)
Score Diff
35 vs 52(+48.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Limon
Higher energy
Kan Portakalı, Çiğ
Score leader
Limon
Nutrient split
12 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kan Portakalı, Çiğ and Limon are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kan Portakalı, Çiğ has 50.0 kcal and Limon has 29.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kan Portakalı, Çiğ | Limon | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 11 µg | 1 µg | -90.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.087 mg | 0.04 mg | -54.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.02 mg | -50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.06 mg | 0.08 mg | +33.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 53.2 mg | 53 mg | -0.4% |
| Demir | 0.1 mg | 0.6 mg | +500.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 2.8 g | +16.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 29 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 30 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 14 mg | 16 mg | +14.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 40 mg | 26 mg | -35.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12 g | 9.32 g | -22.3% |
| Kül | 0.45 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 8 mg | -20.0% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.1 mg | -75.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.25 mg | 0.19 mg | -24.0% |
| Potasyum | 181 mg | 138 mg | -23.8% |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.1 g | +10.0% |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 87.2 g | 88.98 g | +2.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 11 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 8.4 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.3 g | +150.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.35 g | 2.5 g | -73.3% |
| Çinko | 0.07 mg | 0.06 mg | -14.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kan Portakalı, Çiğ and Limon.
Limon has less energy per 100 g (29 kcal versus 50 kcal).
For measured Demir, Kan Portakalı, Çiğ has 0.1 mg and Limon has 0.6 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kan Portakalı, Çiğ 35, Limon 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.