Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Kakao kitlesi has a higher nutrition quality score (39) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
647 vs 263(-59.4%)
Score Diff
39 vs 6(-84.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kakao kitlesi
Higher energy
Kakao kitlesi
Score leader
Kakao kitlesi
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kakao kitlesi and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kakao kitlesi has 647.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 384.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 39 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kakao kitlesi | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 3.8 mg | 0.04 mg | -98.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8 mg | — |
| Demir | 17.4 mg | 0.4 mg | -97.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 16.6 g | 1.1 g | -93.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.59 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 2707 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 430 mg | 9 mg | -97.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.1 µg | 1.2 µg | -70.7% |
| Kafein | 186 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 73 mg | 15 mg | -79.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.7 g | 68 g | +145.5% |
| Kül | 2.4 g | 0.3 g | -87.5% |
| Magnezyum | 327 mg | 6 mg | -98.2% |
| Mangan | 1.9 mg | 0.15 mg | -92.1% |
| Niasin | 2.2 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 830 mg | 77 mg | -90.7% |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 0.4 g | -96.9% |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 12 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 1.5 g | 30.2 g | +1913.3% |
| Teobromin | 1580 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 32.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 52 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 17.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 52.6 g | 0.1 g | -99.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.7 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.3 g | 60.3 g | +20000.0% |
| Çinko | 4.6 mg | 0.08 mg | -98.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kakao kitlesi and Ahududu reçeli.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 647 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Kakao kitlesi has 0.3 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kakao kitlesi 39, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.