Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
691 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Kaju Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
588 vs 691(+17.5%)
Score Diff
27 vs 14(-48.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kaju Ezmesi
Higher energy
Amerikan cevizi
Score leader
Kaju Ezmesi
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kaju Ezmesi and Amerikan cevizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kaju Ezmesi has 588.0 kcal and Amerikan cevizi has 691.0 kcal. The difference is 103.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kaju Ezmesi | Amerikan cevizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.4 mg | 0.66 mg | +65.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.13 mg | -35.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.3 mg | 0.21 mg | -30.0% |
| Bakir | 2.2 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.1 mg | — |
| Demir | 5 mg | 2.53 mg | -49.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2 g | 9.6 g | +380.0% |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 277 mg | -43.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 43 mg | 70 mg | +62.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 26.6 g | 13.86 g | -47.9% |
| Magnezyum | 258 mg | 121 mg | -53.1% |
| Mangan | 0.8 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 1.17 mg | -16.4% |
| Potasyum | 560 mg | 410 mg | -26.8% |
| Protein | 17.5 g | 9.17 g | -47.6% |
| Selenyum | 11.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 15 mg | — | — |
| Su | — | 3.52 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 9.5 g | 6.18 g | -34.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 22 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 27.3 g | 40.8 g | +49.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 49.4 g | 71.97 g | +45.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.8 g | 21.6 g | +176.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.4 g | 3.97 g | -38.0% |
| Çinko | 5.6 mg | 4.53 mg | -19.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kaju Ezmesi and Amerikan cevizi.
Kaju Ezmesi has less energy per 100 g (588 kcal versus 691 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Kaju Ezmesi has 2 g and Amerikan cevizi has 9.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kaju Ezmesi 27, Amerikan cevizi 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.