Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
171 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Alfredo Sos Etli has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
241 vs 171(-29.0%)
Score Diff
23 vs 26(+13.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alfredo Sos Etli
Higher energy
Humus, Aromalı
Score leader
Alfredo Sos Etli
Nutrient split
32 - 21 (tie: 12)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Humus, Aromalı and Alfredo Sos Etli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Humus, Aromalı has 241.0 kcal and Alfredo Sos Etli has 171.0 kcal. The difference is 70.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Humus, Aromalı | Alfredo Sos Etli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 6 µg | 111 µg | +1750.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.02 mg | -86.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.56 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.09 mg | -25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.08 mg | -46.7% |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | 0.02 mg | -94.3% |
| Besin folati | 36 µg | 3 µg | -91.7% |
| Beta Karoten | 60 µg | 5 µg | -91.7% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 18 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 0.1 mg | -97.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.4 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.38 mg | 0.48 mg | -79.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 5.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.81 mg | 0.27 mg | -85.1% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 241 kj | 171 kj | -29.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 36 µg | 3 µg | -91.7% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 166 mg | 76 mg | -54.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 17.2 µg | 1.4 µg | -91.9% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 40 mg | 58 mg | +45.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.63 g | 1.44 g | -90.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 52 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 249 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 71 mg | 7 mg | -90.1% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.02 g | 0.32 g | +1500.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.19 g | 3.85 g | -37.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.09 g | 0.03 g | -66.7% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.98 mg | 0.97 mg | -1.0% |
| Potasyum | 290 mg | 89 mg | -69.3% |
| Protein | 7.22 g | 6.52 g | -9.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 6.88 g | 0.37 g | -94.6% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.63 g | 0.06 g | -90.5% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.03 g | +200.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 111 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 15.6 µg | 6.2 µg | -60.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.3 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.36 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 1.22 g | +12100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.39 g | 3.87 g | +178.4% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.62 g | 1.48 g | +138.7% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0.26 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0.21 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.13 g | — |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 520 mg | +23.8% |
| Su | 59.13 g | 75.06 g | +26.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.18 g | 8.13 g | +272.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 36 µg | 3 µg | -91.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 45.5 mg | 20.3 mg | -55.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.3 g | 3.94 g | -37.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 17.1 g | 15.34 g | -10.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.53 g | 0.6 g | -92.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.49 g | 0.73 g | +49.0% |
| Çinko | 1.4 mg | 1.4 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Humus, Aromalı and Alfredo Sos Etli.
Alfredo Sos Etli has less energy per 100 g (171 kcal versus 241 kcal).
For measured SFA 14:0, Humus, Aromalı has 0.01 g and Alfredo Sos Etli has 1.22 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Humus, Aromalı 23, Alfredo Sos Etli 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.