Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
245 kcal
Score
3 / 100
Acı Biber Sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (63) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
12 vs 245(+1941.7%)
Score Diff
63 vs 3(-95.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı Biber Sosu
Higher energy
Ördek Sosu
Score leader
Acı Biber Sosu
Nutrient split
26 - 13 (tie: 26)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Acı Biber Sosu and Ördek Sosu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Acı Biber Sosu has 12.0 kcal and Ördek Sosu has 245.0 kcal. The difference is 233.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 63 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Acı Biber Sosu | Ördek Sosu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 82 µg | 8 µg | -90.2% |
| Alfa Karoten | 62 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.02 mg | -33.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.01 mg | -87.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.03 mg | -80.0% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.04 mg | -42.9% |
| Besin folati | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 919 µg | 100 µg | -89.1% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 68 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.5 mg | 0.9 mg | -80.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.16 mg | 0.39 mg | -66.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.6 g | 0.6 g | 0.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.01 mg | 0.2 mg | +1900.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 12 kj | 245 kj | +1941.7% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | 2 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 23 mg | 9 mg | -60.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.2 µg | 0.3 µg | +50.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 11 mg | -8.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.8 g | 60.66 g | +7482.5% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 10 µg | 1 µg | -90.0% |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 5 mg | -58.3% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.06 g | 0.01 g | -83.3% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.18 mg | 0.24 mg | +33.3% |
| Potasyum | 128 mg | 87 mg | -32.0% |
| Protein | 1.29 g | 0.36 g | -72.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.4 g | 0.02 g | -95.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0.5 µg | 1.3 µg | +160.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.03 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.09 g | 0.01 g | -88.9% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 633 mg | 712 mg | +12.5% |
| Su | 95.17 g | 37.44 g | -60.7% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.11 g | 0.05 g | -54.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | 2 µg | +100.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 0 mg | 1.7 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.06 g | 0.02 g | -66.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.76 g | 0.13 g | -82.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | 0.03 g | -92.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.13 g | 30.54 g | +23392.3% |
| Çinko | 0.16 mg | 0.21 mg | +31.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Acı Biber Sosu and Ördek Sosu.
Acı Biber Sosu has less energy per 100 g (12 kcal versus 245 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Acı Biber Sosu has 0.13 g and Ördek Sosu has 30.54 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Acı Biber Sosu 63, Ördek Sosu 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.