Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Horoz Fasulye has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 368(+9.2%)
Score Diff
45 vs 32(-28.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Horoz Fasulye
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Horoz Fasulye
Nutrient split
12 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Horoz Fasulye and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Horoz Fasulye has 337.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 31.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Horoz Fasulye | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.53 mg | 0.36 mg | -32.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.32 mg | +52.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.4 mg | 0.49 mg | +22.5% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 0.59 mg | -30.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 6.7 mg | 4.57 mg | -31.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 24.4 g | 7 g | -71.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 407 mg | 457 mg | +12.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 143 mg | 47 mg | -67.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 60.8 g | 64.16 g | +5.5% |
| Kül | 4.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 175 mg | 197 mg | +12.6% |
| Mangan | 1.3 mg | 2 mg | +53.8% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.52 mg | -27.6% |
| Potasyum | 1393 mg | 563 mg | -59.6% |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 14.12 g | -36.7% |
| Selenyum | 8.2 µg | 8.5 µg | +3.7% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 5 mg | -58.3% |
| Su | 11.3 g | 13.28 g | +17.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.35 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 388 µg | 184 µg | -52.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.5 g | 6.07 g | +304.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 0.1 g | -95.2% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 3.1 mg | -3.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Horoz Fasulye and Altın kinoa.
Horoz Fasulye has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Horoz Fasulye has 1.5 g and Altın kinoa has 6.07 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Horoz Fasulye 45, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.