Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
169 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Trifle has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
274 vs 169(-38.3%)
Score Diff
11 vs 17(+54.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Trifle
Higher energy
Haupia
Score leader
Trifle
Nutrient split
20 - 32 (tie: 13)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Haupia and Trifle are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Haupia has 274.0 kcal and Trifle has 169.0 kcal. The difference is 105.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Haupia | Trifle | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 82 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.02 mg | 0.09 mg | +350.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.24 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0 mg | 0.13 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.03 mg | 0.05 mg | +66.7% |
| Bakir | 0.23 mg | 0.04 mg | -82.6% |
| Besin folati | 14 µg | 7 µg | -50.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 44 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 13 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | 0.5 mg | -79.2% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.5 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.44 mg | 0.83 mg | -42.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2 g | 0.4 g | -80.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | 0.37 mg | +184.6% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 274 kj | 169 kj | -38.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 14 µg | 22 µg | +57.1% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 8 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 87 mg | 90 mg | +3.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.1 µg | 1.2 µg | +1100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 73 mg | +421.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.52 g | 23.24 g | -1.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 65 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 62 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 10 mg | -68.8% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0.16 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.87 g | 1.86 g | +113.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.65 mg | 0.61 mg | -6.2% |
| Potasyum | 226 mg | 125 mg | -44.7% |
| Protein | 1.98 g | 3.52 g | +77.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.23 g | 0.31 g | +34.8% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0 g | 0.09 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 77 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 5.6 µg | 4.5 µg | -19.6% |
| SFA 10:0 | 1.14 g | 0.15 g | -86.8% |
| SFA 12:0 | 9.05 g | 0.17 g | -98.1% |
| SFA 14:0 | 3.57 g | 0.61 g | -82.9% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.73 g | 1.83 g | +5.8% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.06 g | 0.8 g | -24.5% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0.19 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.12 g | 0.11 g | -8.3% |
| SFA 8:0 | 1.43 g | 0.07 g | -95.1% |
| Sodyum | 83 mg | 180 mg | +116.9% |
| Su | 53.25 g | 65.3 g | +22.6% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 18.09 g | 4.07 g | -77.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 14 µg | 16 µg | +14.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 7.3 mg | 29.2 mg | +300.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.87 g | 2.1 g | +141.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 20.45 g | 7.15 g | -65.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.23 g | 0.42 g | +82.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 14.72 g | 15.76 g | +7.1% |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.39 mg | -32.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Haupia and Trifle.
Trifle has less energy per 100 g (169 kcal versus 274 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Haupia has 0.1 µg and Trifle has 1.2 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Haupia 11, Trifle 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Haupia · Trifle · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.