Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
228 vs 228(0.0%)
Score Diff
78 vs 66(-15.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu
Higher energy
Energy is equal
Score leader
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has 228.0 kcal and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 228.0 kcal. The difference is 0.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 78 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu | Baobab Meyvesi Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.05 mg | -37.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.14 mg | -41.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Bakir | 3.79 mg | 0.45 mg | -88.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 280 mg | — |
| Demir | 13.86 mg | 2.1 mg | -84.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 33.2 g | 44.5 g | +34.0% |
| Fosfor | 734 mg | 48 mg | -93.5% |
| Kafein | 230 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 128 mg | 295 mg | +130.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 57.9 g | 76.2 g | +31.6% |
| Kül | 5.8 g | 5.8 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 499 mg | 160 mg | -67.9% |
| Mangan | 3.84 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.19 mg | 1.8 mg | -17.8% |
| Potasyum | 1524 mg | 2250 mg | +47.6% |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 2.3 g | -88.3% |
| Selenyum | 14.3 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 3 mg | -85.7% |
| Su | 3 g | 11.2 g | +273.3% |
| Teobromin | 2057 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.07 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.57 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 13.7 g | 0.3 g | -97.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.44 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.75 g | 25.6 g | +1362.9% |
| Çinko | 6.81 mg | 0.9 mg | -86.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu.
The records show 228 kcal per 100 g for both foods.
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has 1.75 g and Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 25.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu 78, Baobab Meyvesi Tozu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.