Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
228 vs 43(-81.1%)
Score Diff
78 vs 49(-37.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu
Higher energy
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu
Score leader
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has 228.0 kcal and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 185.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 78 and 49. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu | Aslan Yelesi Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.14 mg | +75.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.36 mg | +50.0% |
| Bakir | 3.79 mg | 0.19 mg | -95.0% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 2.15 g | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.15 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.86 mg | 0.41 mg | -97.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 33.2 g | 3.4 g | -89.8% |
| Fosfor | 734 mg | 82 mg | -88.8% |
| Kafein | 230 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 128 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 57.9 g | 7.58 g | -86.9% |
| Kül | 5.8 g | 0.84 g | -85.5% |
| Magnezyum | 499 mg | 12 mg | -97.6% |
| Mangan | 3.84 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.19 mg | 1.62 mg | -26.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.45 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1524 mg | 304 mg | -80.1% |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 2.63 g | -86.6% |
| Selenyum | 14.3 µg | 1.4 µg | -90.2% |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 4 mg | -81.0% |
| Su | 3 g | 88.6 g | +2853.3% |
| Teobromin | 2057 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.07 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.57 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 13.7 g | 0.35 g | -97.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.44 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.75 g | 0.52 g | -70.3% |
| Çinko | 6.81 mg | 0.74 mg | -89.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı.
Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 228 kcal).
For measured Su, Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu has 3 g and Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 88.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ham Çiğ Kakao Tozu 78, Aslan Yelesi Mantarı 49.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.