Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
277 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Granny Smith elma has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
52 vs 277(+432.7%)
Score Diff
19 vs 14(-26.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Granny Smith elma
Higher energy
Acve Hurması
Score leader
Granny Smith elma
Nutrient split
2 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Granny Smith elma and Acve Hurması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Granny Smith elma has 52.0 kcal and Acve Hurması has 277.0 kcal. The difference is 225.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Granny Smith elma | Acve Hurması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 3 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.6 mg | 0.4 mg | -91.3% |
| Demir | 0.12 mg | 1 mg | +733.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 7 g | +150.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 52 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 62 mg | +416.7% |
| Fruktoz | 5.5 g | 31.5 g | +472.7% |
| Glikoz | 1.8 g | 31.8 g | +1666.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 64 mg | +1180.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.6 g | 75 g | +451.5% |
| Magnezyum | 5 mg | 54 mg | +980.0% |
| Malik asit | 800 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.26 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.6 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 120 mg | 656 mg | +446.7% |
| Protein | 0.26 g | 2.5 g | +861.5% |
| Sakkaroz | 2.2 g | — | — |
| Sitrik asit | 15 mg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 85.5 g | 21.3 g | -75.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.15 g | 0.4 g | +166.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.5 g | 63.3 g | +566.3% |
| Çinko | 0.04 mg | 0.44 mg | +1000.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Granny Smith elma and Acve Hurması.
Granny Smith elma has less energy per 100 g (52 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured Glikoz, Granny Smith elma has 1.8 g and Acve Hurması has 31.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Granny Smith elma 19, Acve Hurması 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.