Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
27 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Gökkuşağı pazı has a higher nutrition quality score (94) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
19 vs 27(+42.1%)
Score Diff
94 vs 68(-27.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Gökkuşağı pazı
Higher energy
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Score leader
Gökkuşağı pazı
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Gökkuşağı pazı and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Gökkuşağı pazı has 19.0 kcal and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 94 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Gökkuşağı pazı | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 306 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.05 mg | +25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.02 mg | -77.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.099 mg | 0.15 mg | +51.5% |
| Bakir | 0.179 mg | 0.129 mg | -27.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 3647 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 30 mg | 62 mg | +106.7% |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 0.4 mg | -77.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 3.6 g | +125.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.89 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 14 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 46 mg | 46 mg | 0.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 830 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 51 mg | 24 mg | -52.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.74 g | 6.2 g | +65.8% |
| Kül | — | 1 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 11000 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 81 mg | 19 mg | -76.5% |
| Mangan | 0.366 mg | 0.139 mg | -62.0% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.165 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 379 mg | 350 mg | -7.7% |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.7 g | -5.6% |
| Sodyum | 213 mg | 20 mg | -90.6% |
| Su | 92.66 g | 91 g | -1.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.013 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 16 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 12.3 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.1 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.1 g | 2.6 g | +136.4% |
| Çinko | 0.36 mg | 0.03 mg | -91.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Gökkuşağı pazı and Alabaş (Kohlrabi).
Gökkuşağı pazı has less energy per 100 g (19 kcal versus 27 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Gökkuşağı pazı has 1.1 g and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 2.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Gökkuşağı pazı 94, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.