Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
326 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Girda has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
275.7 vs 326(+18.2%)
Score Diff
12 vs 10(-16.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Girda
Higher energy
Sheermal
Score leader
Girda
Nutrient split
11 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Girda and Sheermal are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Girda has 275.7 kcal and Sheermal has 326.0 kcal. The difference is 50.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 12 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Girda | Sheermal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 58 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.28 mg | 0.21 mg | -25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 2.1 mg | -12.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.1 g | -25.0% |
| Folat DFE | 65 µg | 52 µg | -20.0% |
| Fosfor | 95 mg | 125 mg | +31.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 88 mg | +214.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 55.4 g | 49.8 g | -10.1% |
| Kolesterol | — | 21 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.6 g | 1.7 g | +6.2% |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 24 mg | -7.7% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 1.85 mg | -28.8% |
| Potasyum | 135 mg | 152 mg | +12.6% |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 8.2 g | -6.8% |
| Sodyum | 480 mg | 335 mg | -30.2% |
| Su | 32.1 g | 30.5 g | -5.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 5.4 g | +1100.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.55 g | 2.8 g | +409.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.1 g | 9.8 g | +366.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 0.9 g | +5.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.8 g | 7.6 g | +322.2% |
| Çinko | 0.9 mg | 0.95 mg | +5.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Girda and Sheermal.
Girda has less energy per 100 g (275.7 kcal versus 326 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Girda has 0.45 g and Sheermal has 5.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Girda 12, Sheermal 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Girda · Sheermal · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.