Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
175 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Bakso has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
68 vs 175(+157.3%)
Score Diff
16 vs 42(+162.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bakso
Higher energy
Bakso
Score leader
Bakso
Nutrient split
9 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Fukujinzuke and Bakso are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Fukujinzuke has 68.0 kcal and Bakso has 175.0 kcal. The difference is 107.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Fukujinzuke | Bakso | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.05 mg | +66.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.1 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.12 mg | +200.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.18 mg | +125.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 1.8 mg | +63.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 0.4 g | -83.3% |
| Fosfor | 32 mg | 135 mg | +321.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 24 mg | -46.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.2 g | 11.8 g | -27.2% |
| Kolesterol | — | 42 mg | — |
| Kül | 5.2 g | 2.3 g | -55.8% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 14 mg | -22.2% |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.45 mg | 2.6 mg | +477.8% |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 195 mg | -7.1% |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 13.5 g | +650.0% |
| Sodyum | 1850 mg | 680 mg | -63.2% |
| Su | 77.5 g | 63.8 g | -17.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3.4 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.6 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 8.2 g | +2633.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 12.8 g | 0.2 g | -98.4% |
| Çinko | 0.25 mg | 2.4 mg | +860.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Fukujinzuke and Bakso.
Fukujinzuke has less energy per 100 g (68 kcal versus 175 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Fukujinzuke has 0.3 g and Bakso has 8.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Fukujinzuke 16, Bakso 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.