Question 1

What is the main difference between Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) and Agutuk?

Accepted Answer

This comparison summarizes the key differences between Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) and Agutuk in terms of energy (kcal), nutrition quality score and micronutrient balance. Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) tends to have a relatively higher energy value, and both are at a similar level in terms of overall nutrition score. Cards and charts on this page help you visually see in which context each food makes more sense.

Question 2

Which one is lower in calories and potentially better for a calorie-restricted diet?

Accepted Answer

Per 100 g, Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) provides fewer calories than the other option. If you are focusing on calorie control, keeping portions equal, Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) will usually fit more easily into your daily limits.

Question 3

In which situations should I prefer each of them?

Accepted Answer

If keeping total daily calories low is your main goal, you can prioritize the lower-calorie option as your default and use the other one in smaller portions. Over the long term, rotating between similar foods is usually a good way to keep both taste and nutrient variety high.

Question 4

How do they compare in protein, fat and carbohydrates?

Accepted Answer

According to the nutrient comparison: E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol): Agutuk leads significantly; Toplam yağ: Agutuk leads significantly; Kül: Agutuk leads significantly. The "Nutrients (per 100 g)" table on this page shows in detail which food leads in each nutrient. The one with higher protein may be more advantageous for muscle repair and satiety goals.

Question 5

Which is better for a weight loss diet?

Accepted Answer

In terms of calories, Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) provides fewer calories per portion, so you consume less energy for the same serving size. This is usually an advantage when aiming for weight loss. Consuming both in balanced portions, with the lower-calorie one slightly more often, is a sensible approach.

Question 6

Which is better after exercise or sports?

Accepted Answer

In terms of protein, Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) stands out. Since protein intake is important for muscle repair and recovery, Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) may be a better choice for post-workout meals. Also, the food with higher carbohydrates can help replenish muscle glycogen stores. Check the protein and carbohydrate values in the nutrient comparison on this page to decide.

Nutrients	Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi)	Agutuk	Difference
A Vitamini (IU)	648 iu	257 iu	-60.3%
A Vitamini (RAE)	195 µg	34 µg	-82.6%
Alanin	1.35 g	0 g	-100.0%
Alfa Karoten	0 µg	0 µg	—
Alfa tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Arjinin	1.33 g	0 g	-100.0%
Aspartik asit	1.97 g	0 g	-100.0%
B1 Vitamini (Tiamin)	0 mg	0.06 mg	—
B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin)	0 mg	0.06 mg	—
Bakir	0.15 mg	0.03 mg	-80.0%
Beta Karoten	0 µg	0 µg	—
Beta kriptoksantin	0 µg	0 µg	—
Beta tokoferol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Beta tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Betain	16.3 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Delta tokoferol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Delta tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Demir	17 mg	0.2 mg	-98.8%
Diyet lifi	0 g	0 g	—
E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol)	0.27 mg	4 mg	+1381.5%
Enerji	186 kj	1964 kj	+955.9%
Etil alkol	0 g	0 g	—
Fenilalanin	0.94 g	0 g	-100.0%
Fosfor	140 mg	134 mg	-4.3%
Fruktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Galaktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Gama tokoferol	0.04 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Gama tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Glikoz	0 g	0 g	—
Glisin	1.24 g	0 g	-100.0%
Glutamik asit	3.16 g	0 g	-100.0%
Histidin	0.84 g	0 g	-100.0%
Izolosin	0.9 g	0 g	-100.0%
K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon)	0 µg	0 µg	—
K Vitamini (filokinon)	0 µg	0 µg	—
K Vitamini (menakinon-4)	0.6 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Kafein	0 mg	0 mg	—
Kalsiyum	4 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Karbonhidrat (farkla)	0 g	10.5 g	—
Kolesterol	121 mg	26 mg	-78.5%
Kül	0.8 g	3 g	+275.0%
Laktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Likopen	0 µg	0 µg	—
Lizin	1.91 g	0 g	-100.0%
Losin	1.83 g	0 g	-100.0%
Lutein + zeaksantin	0 µg	0 µg	—
Magnezyum	17 mg	16 mg	-5.9%
Maltoz	0 g	0 g	—
Mangan	0.04 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Metiyonin	0.48 g	0 g	-100.0%
Niasin	0 mg	1.43 mg	—
Nisasta	0 g	0 g	—
Potasyum	210 mg	206 mg	-1.9%
Prolin	1.08 g	0 g	-100.0%
Protein	23.63 g	9 g	-61.9%
PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit)	0 g	16.1 g	—
PUFA 18:3	0 g	0.5 g	—
Retinol	194 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Sakkaroz	0 g	0 g	—
Serin	0.86 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sistin	0.13 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sodyum	57 mg	24 mg	-57.9%
Su	63.35 g	34 g	-46.3%
Teobromin	0 mg	0 mg	—
Tirozin	0.62 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam doymus yağ asitleri	0 g	8.6 g	—
Toplam Kolin	63.1 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri	0 g	15.6 g	—
Toplam yağ	10.17 g	43.5 g	+327.7%
Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri	0 g	17.3 g	—
Toplam Şeker	0 g	0 g	—
Treonin	0.92 g	0 g	-100.0%
Triptofan	0.23 g	0 g	-100.0%
Valin	0.92 g	0 g	-100.0%
Çinko	2.6 mg	0.47 mg	-81.9%

Fok, Sakallı (Oogruk), Et, Düşük Quadrant, Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi) vs Agutuk, Balık Kısaltma Ile (Alaskan Dondurma) (Alaska Yerlisi)

Fok - Çiğ (Alaska Yerlisi)

Agutuk

Community Insights & Reviews

Ask Question or Rate

Recent Comments

Comparison Analysis

Visual comparison

Energy and score summary

Nutrient profile (normalized radar)

Percentage difference map

Dynamic comparison article

Nutrients (per 100 g)

Comparison Analysis: FAQ

Comparison Results