Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
195 kcal
Score
5 / 100
Foi thong has a higher nutrition quality score (22) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
355.5 vs 195(-45.1%)
Score Diff
22 vs 5(-77.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Foi thong
Higher energy
Foi thong
Score leader
Foi thong
Nutrient split
12 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Foi thong and Shiratama are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Foi thong has 355.5 kcal and Shiratama has 195.0 kcal. The difference is 160.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 5. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Foi thong | Shiratama | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 615 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 185 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.95 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.02 mg | -90.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.8 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 0.3 mg | -83.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.6 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 195 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 8 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 35 mg | -78.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 55 mg | 6 mg | -89.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 57.2 g | 44.2 g | -22.7% |
| Kolesterol | 420 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1 g | 0.6 g | -40.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 680 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 12 mg | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| Nisasta | — | 43 g | — |
| Potasyum | 95 mg | 28 mg | -70.5% |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 2.8 g | -51.7% |
| Sakkaroz | 54 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 48 mg | 2 mg | -95.8% |
| Su | 24.5 g | 52 g | +112.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 56 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 260 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 11.5 g | 0.4 g | -96.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 55.5 g | 0.1 g | -99.8% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.4 mg | -63.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Foi thong and Shiratama.
Shiratama has less energy per 100 g (195 kcal versus 355.5 kcal).
For measured Su, Foi thong has 24.5 g and Shiratama has 52 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Foi thong 22, Shiratama 5.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.