Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
166 kcal
Score
31 / 100
Humus has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
514 vs 166(-67.7%)
Score Diff
9 vs 31(+244.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Humus
Higher energy
Falafel
Score leader
Humus
Nutrient split
10 - 9 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Falafel and Humus are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Falafel has 514.0 kcal and Humus has 166.0 kcal. The difference is 348.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 31. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Falafel | Humus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 12 µg | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.13 mg | 0.17 mg | +30.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | 0.18 mg | +12.5% |
| Bakir | 0.18 mg | 0.42 mg | +133.3% |
| Besin folati | 75 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 136 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 11 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 7.3 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.31 mg | 2.44 mg | +5.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 4.8 g | 6 g | +25.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 7.74 mg | — | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 514 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 166 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 83 µg | 83 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 5 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 112 mg | 176 mg | +57.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 72.2 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 86 mg | 38 mg | -55.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 28.96 g | 14.3 g | -50.6% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 111 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 31 mg | 71 mg | +129.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.14 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 16.59 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.26 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 259 mg | 228 mg | -12.0% |
| Protein | 8.28 g | 7.9 g | -4.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 14.18 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 1.74 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Selenyum | 1.4 µg | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 3.93 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.15 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 499 mg | 379 mg | -24.0% |
| Su | 18.73 g | 58.3 g | +211.3% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.43 g | 1.4 g | -74.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 79 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 37.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 17.01 g | 4.1 g | -75.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 41.19 g | 9.6 g | -76.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 15.93 g | 3.5 g | -78.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.52 g | 0.3 g | -93.4% |
| Çinko | 1.02 mg | 1.5 mg | +47.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Falafel and Humus.
Humus has less energy per 100 g (166 kcal versus 514 kcal).
For measured Su, Falafel has 18.73 g and Humus has 58.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Falafel 9, Humus 31.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Falafel · Humus · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.