Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Altın kinoa has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
367 vs 368(+0.3%)
Score Diff
18 vs 32(+77.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın kinoa
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Altın kinoa
Nutrient split
8 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Esmer Pirinç and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Esmer Pirinç has 367.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 18 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Esmer Pirinç | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.41 mg | 0.36 mg | -12.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.32 mg | +255.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.51 mg | 0.49 mg | -3.9% |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | 0.59 mg | +110.7% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 4.57 mg | +210.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.5 g | 7 g | +100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.2 mg | 2.44 mg | +103.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 333 mg | 457 mg | +37.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 23 mg | 47 mg | +104.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 77.24 g | 64.16 g | -16.9% |
| Kül | 1.45 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 143 mg | 197 mg | +37.8% |
| Mangan | 3.74 mg | 2 mg | -46.5% |
| Niasin | 5.09 mg | 1.52 mg | -70.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.49 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 223 mg | 563 mg | +152.5% |
| Protein | 7.54 g | 14.12 g | +87.3% |
| Selenyum | 9.8 µg | 8.5 µg | -13.3% |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 5 mg | -28.6% |
| Su | 10.37 g | 13.28 g | +28.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.55 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 20 µg | 184 µg | +820.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.05 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.74 g | 6.07 g | +121.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.95 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.85 g | 0.1 g | -88.2% |
| Çinko | 2.02 mg | 3.1 mg | +53.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Esmer Pirinç and Altın kinoa.
Esmer Pirinç has less energy per 100 g (367 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Esmer Pirinç has 20 µg and Altın kinoa has 184 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Esmer Pirinç 18, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.