Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
98 kcal
Score
35 / 100
Ajvar has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
278 vs 98(-64.8%)
Score Diff
22 vs 35(+59.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ajvar
Higher energy
Elma Pekmezi
Score leader
Ajvar
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Elma Pekmezi and Ajvar are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Elma Pekmezi has 278.0 kcal and Ajvar has 98.0 kcal. The difference is 180.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Elma Pekmezi | Ajvar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 78 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | 0.19 mg | +35.7% |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 935 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.8 mg | 62.4 mg | +3366.7% |
| Demir | 3.8 mg | 0.85 mg | -77.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.3 g | 2.6 g | +766.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.75 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 48 mg | 29 mg | -39.6% |
| Fruktoz | 34.8 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 23.1 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115 mg | 19 mg | -83.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.5 g | 8.35 g | -87.8% |
| Kül | 2 g | 1.6 g | -20.0% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 15 mg | -64.3% |
| Malik asit | 1250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.65 mg | 0.88 mg | +35.4% |
| Potasyum | 840 mg | 235 mg | -72.0% |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.45 g | +61.1% |
| Sakkaroz | 4.6 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 490 mg | +1941.7% |
| Su | 28.2 g | 81.8 g | +190.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.72 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 21 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.85 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 5.8 g | +5700.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.95 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 62.5 g | 4.9 g | -92.2% |
| Çinko | 0.75 mg | 0.28 mg | -62.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Elma Pekmezi and Ajvar.
Ajvar has less energy per 100 g (98 kcal versus 278 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Elma Pekmezi has 0.1 g and Ajvar has 5.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Elma Pekmezi 22, Ajvar 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.