Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Elma Pekmezi has a higher nutrition quality score (22) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
278 vs 263(-5.4%)
Score Diff
22 vs 6(-72.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Elma Pekmezi
Higher energy
Elma Pekmezi
Score leader
Elma Pekmezi
Nutrient split
12 - 3 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Elma Pekmezi and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Elma Pekmezi has 278.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Elma Pekmezi | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | 0.04 mg | -85.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.8 mg | 8 mg | +344.4% |
| Demir | 3.8 mg | 0.4 mg | -89.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.3 g | 1.1 g | +266.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 48 mg | 9 mg | -81.3% |
| Fruktoz | 34.8 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 23.1 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115 mg | 15 mg | -87.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.5 g | 68 g | -0.7% |
| Kül | 2 g | 0.3 g | -85.0% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 6 mg | -85.7% |
| Malik asit | 1250 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.65 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 840 mg | 77 mg | -90.8% |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.4 g | -55.6% |
| Sakkaroz | 4.6 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 12 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 28.2 g | 30.2 g | +7.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.1 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 62.5 g | 60.3 g | -3.5% |
| Çinko | 0.75 mg | 0.08 mg | -89.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Elma Pekmezi and Ahududu reçeli.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 278 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Elma Pekmezi has 1.8 mg and Ahududu reçeli has 8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Elma Pekmezi 22, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.