Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
260 kcal
Score
21 / 100
Tam Buğday Ekmeği has a higher nutrition quality score (21) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
342 vs 260(-24.0%)
Score Diff
16 vs 21(+31.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tam Buğday Ekmeği
Higher energy
Ekmek Çubukları
Score leader
Tam Buğday Ekmeği
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ekmek Çubukları and Tam Buğday Ekmeği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ekmek Çubukları has 342.0 kcal and Tam Buğday Ekmeği has 260.0 kcal. The difference is 82.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 21. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ekmek Çubukları | Tam Buğday Ekmeği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 24 µg | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.49 mg | 0.3 mg | -38.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.13 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.56 mg | 0.2 mg | -64.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.15 mg | +50.0% |
| Bakir | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| Besin folati | 24 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 7 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.64 mg | 2.5 mg | -46.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 7 g | +191.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.88 mg | — | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 342 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 260 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 233 µg | 50 µg | -78.5% |
| Folik asit | 123 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 129 mg | 200 mg | +55.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 21.1 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 87 mg | 100 mg | +14.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 44.39 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 45 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 7 mg | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 10 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 80 mg | +263.6% |
| Mangan | — | 1 mg | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.07 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.62 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 7.07 mg | 4 mg | -43.4% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 250 mg | +89.4% |
| Protein | 12.18 g | 10 g | -17.9% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 5.4 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.72 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 23 µg | — | — |
| Selenyum | 22 µg | 30 µg | +36.4% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.06 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.22 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.77 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.67 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.04 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.03 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 615 mg | 400 mg | -35.0% |
| Su | 28.32 g | 35 g | +23.6% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.96 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 147 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 7.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.77 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.85 g | 3.5 g | -72.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.15 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.11 g | 5 g | +350.5% |
| Çinko | 1.02 mg | 1.5 mg | +47.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ekmek Çubukları and Tam Buğday Ekmeği.
Tam Buğday Ekmeği has less energy per 100 g (260 kcal versus 342 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ekmek Çubukları has 1.11 g and Tam Buğday Ekmeği has 5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ekmek Çubukları 16, Tam Buğday Ekmeği 21.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.