Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
164.5 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Kluai buat chi has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
284 vs 164.5(-42.1%)
Score Diff
7 vs 13(+85.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kluai buat chi
Higher energy
Dorayaki
Score leader
Kluai buat chi
Nutrient split
11 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dorayaki and Kluai buat chi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dorayaki has 284.0 kcal and Kluai buat chi has 164.5 kcal. The difference is 119.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 7 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dorayaki | Kluai buat chi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 26 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.032 mg | -46.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.038 mg | -57.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.45 mg | -62.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 1.74 g | -37.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 164.5 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 88 mg | 28 mg | -68.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 34 mg | 14.5 mg | -57.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 59.5 g | 20.85 g | -65.0% |
| Kolesterol | 42 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.38 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.55 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 248 mg | +71.0% |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 1.15 g | -81.5% |
| Sodyum | 135 mg | 45 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 27.3 g | 67.2 g | +146.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 8.32 g | +878.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 22 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.25 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.2 g | 9.42 g | +194.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 37.4 g | 14.2 g | -62.0% |
| Çinko | 0.65 mg | 0.22 mg | -66.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dorayaki and Kluai buat chi.
Kluai buat chi has less energy per 100 g (164.5 kcal versus 284 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Dorayaki has 0.85 g and Kluai buat chi has 8.32 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dorayaki 7, Kluai buat chi 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.