Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
195.7 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Dinengdeng has a higher nutrition quality score (70) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
42.5 vs 195.7(+360.5%)
Score Diff
70 vs 23(-67.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dinengdeng
Higher energy
Bindaetteok
Score leader
Dinengdeng
Nutrient split
4 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dinengdeng and Bindaetteok are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dinengdeng has 42.5 kcal and Bindaetteok has 195.7 kcal. The difference is 153.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 70 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dinengdeng | Bindaetteok | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 52 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.16 mg | +220.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.09 mg | +12.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 620 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 18.5 mg | 5.2 mg | -71.9% |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 1.7 mg | +54.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 3.8 g | +111.1% |
| Folat DFE | — | 62 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 125 mg | +140.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 48 mg | 36 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.8 g | 16.9 g | +252.1% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | 1.8 g | +63.6% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 42 mg | +50.0% |
| Niasin | 0.95 mg | 1.45 mg | +52.6% |
| Potasyum | 245 mg | 290 mg | +18.4% |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 8.4 g | +100.0% |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 385 mg | -8.3% |
| Su | 86.8 g | 62.4 g | -28.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.3 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.1 g | 10.5 g | +854.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.4 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.9 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 1.2 mg | +166.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dinengdeng and Bindaetteok.
Dinengdeng has less energy per 100 g (42.5 kcal versus 195.7 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Dinengdeng has 1.1 g and Bindaetteok has 10.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dinengdeng 70, Bindaetteok 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.