Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Abiyuch, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 69(-75.1%)
Score Diff
14 vs 57(+307.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Higher energy
Hurma, Medjool
Score leader
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Nutrient split
21 - 4 (tie: 4)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hurma, Medjool and Abiyuch, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hurma, Medjool has 277.0 kcal and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 208.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
29 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hurma, Medjool | Abiyuch, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 149 iu | 100 iu | -32.9% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 7 µg | 5 µg | -28.6% |
| Alanin | 0.08 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Arjinin | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 0.22 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.36 mg | 0.06 mg | -83.3% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 89 µg | 60 µg | -32.6% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Betain | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 54.1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | — | — |
| Demir | 0.9 mg | 1.61 mg | +78.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 5.3 g | -20.9% |
| Enerji | 1160 kj | 290 kj | -75.0% |
| Fenilalanin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 47 mg | -24.2% |
| Fruktoz | 31.95 g | 3.8 g | -88.1% |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Glikoz | 33.68 g | 4.5 g | -86.6% |
| Glisin | 0.09 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 0.27 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.04 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.7 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 8 mg | -87.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 74.97 g | 17.6 g | -76.5% |
| Kül | 1.74 g | 0.9 g | -48.3% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lizin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.08 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 23 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 54 mg | 24 mg | -55.6% |
| Maltoz | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Mangan | 0.3 mg | 0.18 mg | -40.0% |
| Metiyonin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.61 mg | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.81 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 696 mg | 304 mg | -56.3% |
| Prolin | 0.11 g | — | — |
| Protein | 1.81 g | 1.5 g | -17.1% |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0.53 g | 0.05 g | -90.6% |
| Serin | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 20 mg | +1900.0% |
| Su | 21.32 g | 79.9 g | +274.8% |
| Tirozin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 15 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 9.9 mg | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.15 g | 0.1 g | -33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 66.47 g | 8.55 g | -87.1% |
| Treonin | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.44 mg | 0.31 mg | -29.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hurma, Medjool and Abiyuch, Çiğ.
Abiyuch, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (69 kcal versus 277 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Hurma, Medjool has 1 mg and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 20 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hurma, Medjool 14, Abiyuch, Çiğ 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.