Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
138 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
175.3 vs 138(-21.3%)
Score Diff
56 vs 71(+26.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli)
Higher energy
Dana Gerdan
Score leader
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli)
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dana Gerdan and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dana Gerdan has 175.3 kcal and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 138.0 kcal. The difference is 37.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dana Gerdan | Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 24 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.6 µg | 4.8 µg | +84.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 14.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 0.85 mg | -64.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.68 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Fosfor | 190 mg | 260 mg | +36.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 28 mg | +133.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 62 mg | -13.9% |
| Kül | 1 g | 1.3 g | +30.0% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 31 mg | +47.6% |
| Niasin | 4.5 mg | 5.2 mg | +15.6% |
| Potasyum | 320 mg | 380 mg | +18.8% |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 20.5 g | +1.5% |
| Selenyum | 26.5 µg | 28.5 µg | +7.5% |
| Sodyum | 65 mg | 56 mg | -13.8% |
| Su | 68.3 g | 75.4 g | +10.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.2 g | 1.25 g | -70.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.6 g | 1.85 g | -59.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 10.5 g | 5.8 g | -44.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 1.62 g | +260.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 5.8 mg | 0.92 mg | -84.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dana Gerdan and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli).
Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has less energy per 100 g (138 kcal versus 175.3 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Dana Gerdan has 0.45 g and Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) has 1.62 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dana Gerdan 56, Alabalık (Kırmızı Benekli) 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.