Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
276 vs 282(+2.2%)
Score Diff
89 vs 77(-13.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter)
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter)
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) and Aleppo biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has 276.0 kcal and Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 89 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) | Aleppo biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 190 µg | 1480 µg | +678.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.51 mg | 0.3 mg | -41.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.47 mg | 0.9 mg | +91.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 2.1 mg | +500.0% |
| Bakir | 0.86 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 17000 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 50 mg | 75 mg | +50.0% |
| Demir | 123.6 mg | 14.5 mg | -88.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 37 g | 27.2 g | -26.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 28 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 201 mg | 290 mg | +44.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1890 mg | 148 mg | -92.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 63.94 g | 52 g | -18.7% |
| Magnezyum | 220 mg | 152 mg | -30.9% |
| Mangan | 7.87 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 4.94 mg | 8.7 mg | +76.1% |
| Potasyum | 814 mg | 1950 mg | +139.6% |
| Protein | 9.11 g | 12 g | +31.7% |
| Sodyum | 55 mg | 1600 mg | +2809.1% |
| Su | 7.79 g | 10.5 g | +34.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.73 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 274 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.81 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.43 g | 10 g | +34.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.19 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.71 g | 10.3 g | +502.3% |
| Çinko | 6.18 mg | 2.4 mg | -61.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) and Aleppo biberi.
Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has less energy per 100 g (276 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) has 55 mg and Aleppo biberi has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dağ Kekiği (Zahter) 89, Aleppo biberi 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.